Digital coercive control has become a routine infrastructure of intimate partner domination, yet it is still easily misrecognized in couple and family therapy as a solvable problem of trust, jealousy, or mutually negotiated transparency. Using a feminist family therapy lens, this article argues that technology-facilitated tactics – tracking, credential capture, device administration, impersonation, and reputation manipulation – should be assessed as patterned liberty restrictions rather than isolated “online incidents.” Drawing on current scholarship and clinical practice concerns, the article integrates a focused literature review, clinician guidance for therapists with limited technology knowledge, recommendations for keeping current with rapidly evolving platforms, illustrative assessment questions, and a case vignette showing how the Safety–Repair Protocol can be used in practice. The protocol guides clinicians through (a) competency-aware preparation; (b) power-attentive, private screening; (c) systemic mapping of the family’s digital ecosystem; (d) risk-based decisions about conjoint versus individual formats; (e) stabilization and digital safety planning; and (f) accountability criteria that must be met before any “repair” work proceeds. The model is designed to reduce false symmetry, prevent therapeutic collusion, and strengthen socially responsible practice across diverse cultural contexts in telehealth, hybrid, and in-person care.